HomeProvider details
Data API

Is the yi-01ai API down? Live status, latency & uptime by region

· rebuilt about every 30 minutes

Is the yi-01ai API down right now?

Reachable from all 4 regions

Last successful probe Oct 21, 20:16 UTC · every 5 minutes from 4 region(s)

There was an outage: on Oct 19, 00:50 UTC, host probes failed from 2 of 4 regions simultaneously for at least 10 minutes. No other provider failed in that window, so a shared route or CDN does not explain it. Measured from outside yi-01ai’s own network, independently of its status page; full log: measured AI API incidents.

Real requests: not measured for yi-01ai — only the API host is probed here, so errors limited to specific models are invisible to these probes. That is exactly what a status page tends to report, hence the line below.

yi-01ai publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to cross-check against.

As of October 21, 2026, the yi-01ai AI API responds in 194 ms p50 (edge, time-to-first-byte) from Asia (Tokyo) — its fastest measured region — with 89.9% uptime. Slowest is South America (São Paulo) at 331 ms p50.

Endpoint response (TTFB), 24 h
194 ms
Typical (p50) from Asia (Tokyo), the fastest region
Uptime, 24 h
97.4%
1,152 probes across 4 region(s)
Failed probes, 72 h
124
of 3,460 · US (Central), Asia (Tokyo), South America (São Paulo)
Reported by yi-01ai, 72 h
—
no machine-readable status page

Was yi-01ai down in the last 3 days?

Yes. 1 outage(s) could be attributed to yi-01ai in the last 72 hours: probes failed from two or more regions at once while no other provider was failing.

  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · at least 15 minutes · 3 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · at least 5 minutes · 2 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · at least 15 minutes · 3 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout

Earlier days with yi-01ai incidents: Oct 19 (1 outage) · Oct 16 (1 outage) · Oct 13 (1 outage) · Oct 12 (1 outage) · Oct 9 (1 outage) · Oct 8 (1 outage) · Oct 4 (1 outage) · Oct 1 (1 outage)

Show this live in your README: yi-01ai API status badge — embed code

What yi-01ai’s own status page reported

yi-01ai publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to set against the measurements above.

Is yi-01ai getting faster or slower?

Endpoint response (TTFB) · milliseconds · lower is faster

Last 72 hours · UTC · newest time on the right · current hour is incomplete.

Each line shows a region’s typical response per hour (p50), using the same scale. A gap means no successful timed probe in that hour.

typical response per hour (p50)all probes succeededsome failed (under half)half or more failedno probes recorded

yi-01ai — hourly p50 edge latency (ms) and probe outcomes per region, last 72 hoursEndpoint response time in milliseconds. Lower is faster. Each region uses the same vertical scale from 0 to 800 ms. Lines show hourly p50 values; gaps have no successful timed probes. Outcome counts are listed after this chart.Oct 19Oct 20Oct 21nowOct 18, 21:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 264 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 207 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 121 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 323 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failedOct 18, 22:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 220 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 202 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 130 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 316 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failedOct 18, 23:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 216 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 209 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 130 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 321 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 00:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 228 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 221 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 173 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 331 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 01:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 240 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 228 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 183 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 372 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 02:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 223 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 214 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 202 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 396 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 03:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 250 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 210 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 184 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 336 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 04:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 223 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 220 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 478 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 328 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 05:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 245 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 214 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 195 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 335 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 06:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 229 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 227 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 218 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 341 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 07:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 224 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 193 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 328 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 08:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 215 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 205 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 328 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 09:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 267 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 220 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 185 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 337 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 10:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 301 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 216 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 138 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 330 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 11:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 271 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 216 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 189 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 327 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 12:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 235 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 217 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 219 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 333 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 13:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 401 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 214 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 271 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 342 ms (p50 TTFB) · 6 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 14:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 243 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 223 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 206 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 336 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 15:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 249 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 230 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 328 ms (p50 TTFB) · 5 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 16:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 233 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 221 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 188 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 330 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 17:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 274 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 211 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 168 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 332 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 18:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 207 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 160 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 326 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 19:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 244 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 205 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 154 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 320 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 20:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 227 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 208 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 164 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 324 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 21:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 241 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 209 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 159 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 319 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 22:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 221 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 211 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 148 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 324 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 23:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 203 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 165 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 323 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failedOct 20, 00:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 233 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 211 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 171 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 335 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failedOct 20, 01:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 215 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 167 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 345 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failedOct 20, 02:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 236 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 217 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 182 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 326 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failedOct 20, 03:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 225 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 194 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 331 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 04:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 232 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 230 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 466 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 332 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 05:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 244 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 232 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Asia (Tokyo): typical 186 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 339 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 06:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 249 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 266 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 185 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 350 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failedOct 20, 07:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 290 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 194 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 348 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 08:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 243 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 221 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 09:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 254 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 241 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 179 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 350 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 10:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 294 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 234 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 229 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 347 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 11:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 256 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 229 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 178 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 359 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failedOct 20, 12:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 235 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 244 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 336 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failedOct 20, 13:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 256 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 224 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 257 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 333 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 14:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 233 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 233 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 191 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 331 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failedOct 20, 15:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 243 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 224 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 615 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 335 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failedOct 20, 16:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 228 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 223 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 222 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 336 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 17:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 245 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 221 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 189 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 329 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 18:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 214 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 217 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 184 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 326 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 19:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 212 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 213 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 173 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 326 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 20:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 224 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 207 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 152 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 319 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 21:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 201 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 222 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 131 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 322 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 22:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 208 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 207 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 154 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 322 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 23:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 218 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 218 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 161 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 328 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 00:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 211 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 224 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 192 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 324 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 01:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 218 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 220 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 190 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 336 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 02:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 218 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 205 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 334 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 03:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 221 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 222 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 202 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 335 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 04:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 253 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 225 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 197 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 328 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 05:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 285 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 226 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 197 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 345 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 06:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 293 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 233 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 194 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 13 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 335 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 07:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 238 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 224 ms (p50 TTFB) · 4 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 351 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 08:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 224 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 286 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 336 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 09:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 230 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 222 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 228 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 338 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 10:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 240 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 226 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 250 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 338 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 11:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 213 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 232 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 277 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 339 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 12:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 285 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 235 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 280 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 337 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 13:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 300 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 222 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 213 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 331 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 14:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 241 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 216 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 336 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 15:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 238 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 227 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 395 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 337 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 16:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 274 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 226 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 332 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 17:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 240 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 215 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 196 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 333 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 18:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 230 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 223 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 172 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 323 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 19:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 216 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 212 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 166 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 321 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 20:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 232 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 218 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 168 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 323 ms (p50 TTFB)8000Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 858 probes succeeded8000Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 20, 04:00 UTC: all 384 probes succeededOct 20, 05:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 06:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 460 probes succeeded8000Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 19, 00:00 UTC: all 48 probes succeededOct 19, 01:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 02:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 03:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 04:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 05:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 06:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeededOct 19, 07:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 08:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 09:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 10:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 11:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 12:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 13:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 14:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeededOct 19, 15:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 16:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 17:00 – Oct 20, 02:00 UTC: all 120 probes succeededOct 20, 03:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 04:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 05:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 06:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 07:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 08:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 09:00 – Oct 20, 10:00 UTC: all 24 probes succeededOct 20, 11:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 12:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 13:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 14:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 15:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 16:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeededOct 20, 17:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 18:00 – Oct 20, 22:00 UTC: all 60 probes succeededOct 20, 23:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 00:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeededOct 21, 01:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 02:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 03:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeededOct 21, 04:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 05:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeededOct 21, 06:00 UTC: 2 of 13 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 07:00 UTC: 4 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 08:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeededOct 21, 09:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 10:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 11:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 12:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 13:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 14:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 15:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 16:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 17:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeededOct 21, 18:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 19:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 15 probes succeeded8000Oct 18, 21:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 18, 22:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 18, 23:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — [Errno 101] Network is unreachableOct 19, 00:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — [Errno 101] Network is unreachable,timeoutOct 19, 01:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 02:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 03:00 – Oct 19, 12:00 UTC: all 120 probes succeededOct 19, 13:00 UTC: 6 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 14:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 15:00 UTC: 5 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 16:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 17:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 18:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 19:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 20:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 21:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 22:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeededOct 19, 23:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 00:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 01:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 02:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 03:00 – Oct 20, 05:00 UTC: all 36 probes succeededOct 20, 06:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 07:00 – Oct 20, 10:00 UTC: all 48 probes succeededOct 20, 11:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 12:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 13:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeededOct 20, 14:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 15:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 16:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 340 probes succeeded
Europe (Germany)latest 232 · median 242 msUS (Central)latest 218 · median 222 msAsia (Tokyo)latest 168 · median 192 msSouth America (São Paulo)latest 323 · median 332 ms
Probe counts by region
Europe (Germany): 0 failed / 858 endpoint probesUS (Central): 1 failed / 856 endpoint probesAsia (Tokyo): 71 failed / 856 endpoint probesSouth America (São Paulo): 49 failed / 856 endpoint probes
Chart details

The strip shows endpoint probe outcomes, not model-request success. Adjacent hours with all successes or no data are joined. Hover an hour for its recorded values.

Latest is the most recent hourly p50 with data. Median is the median of hourly p50 values over these 72 hours. The “slower than usual” label means latest is at least 25% above that median; it is a relative change, not a fixed speed rating.

How fast is the yi-01ai API from each region?

Endpoint response (TTFB) · last 24 hours · milliseconds (ms) · lower is faster.

How to read these metrics
Endpoint response (TTFB)Network connection and the first response byte, without model inference.
Typical · p5050% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
Slower · p9595% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
RegionTypical (p50 TTFB)Slower (p95)Uptime
Asia (Tokyo)194 ms1042 ms89.9%
Europe (Germany)225 ms836 ms100%
South America (São Paulo)331 ms1196 ms100%
US (Central)222 ms877 ms100%

Measured from Asia (Tokyo), yi-01ai responds in 194 ms; from South America (São Paulo) the same API takes 331 ms — 1.7× longer for an identical request. That difference is the network path, not the model, and it applies to every call you make.

What is actually being measured here?

A probe in each region opens a real connection to yi-01ai’s own API host every five minutes and times DNS resolution, the TCP handshake, the TLS handshake and the first byte of the response. Nothing is routed through a gateway or aggregator, so these figures describe yi-01ai’s infrastructure rather than a reseller’s. Uptime counts a probe as failed only when the service genuinely fails — a 401 from an unauthenticated probe means the endpoint answered correctly and is counted as up.

What this page does not tell you

These are edge latency numbers: the time before the model begins generating. They say nothing about answer quality, throughput, price, or how long a full completion takes — those depend on the model you call. Edge latency matters because it is unavoidable: it is paid on every request, before a single token exists, and no prompt engineering removes it. Where an API key is available, inference time-to-first-token is measured separately and shown on the region pages with the model named next to the figure. Likewise, an unauthenticated probe cannot see errors that hit only some models or some accounts — the kind a status page usually reports — which is why yi-01ai’s own reports are shown next to the measurements rather than folded into them.