AI Latency Tracker · Fastest AI API · Time to first token · Uptime · Incidents · Subscriptions · Price vs latency · Adoption · Reports Methodology · Deprecations · Migrations · Glossary · Data · Changelog
Is the TypeSafe API down? Live status, latency & uptime by region
Last verified September 27, 2026 · rebuilt about every 30 minutes
Is the TypeSafe API down right now? Reachable from all 4 regions, requests to jev-1.13.0 succeeding
Last successful probe Sep 27, 14:15 UTC · every 5 minutes from 4 region(s) · status feed checked Sep 27, 14:17 UTC
Every probe from every region reached the typesafe API successfully in the last 72 hours. Measured from outside typesafe’s own network, independently of its status page; full log: measured AI API incidents .
Real requests to jev-1.13.0: 19 of 19 succeeded in the last 24 hours from 4 region(s); none failed in the last 72 hours. A one-question decision request (a single yes/no Noul) is sent on the same schedule as the host probe; 5xx, 529 and timeouts count as failures, problems with our own key or quota are excluded.
TypeSafe’s status page lists no open incident (checked Sep 27, 14:17 UTC).
As of September 27, 2026, the typesafe AI API responds in 111 ms p50 (edge, time-to-first-byte) from US (Central) — its fastest measured region — with 100% uptime. Slowest is Europe (Germany) at 284 ms p50.
Edge latency, 24 h
111 ms
p50 from US (Central), the fastest region
Uptime, 24 h
100%
74 probes across 4 region(s)
Failed probes, 72 h
0
of 74 probes, all regions
Failed requests, 24 h
0
of 19 to jev-1.13.0
Reported by TypeSafe, 72 h
0
on status.typesafe.ai
Was typesafe down in the last 3 days?
No. All 74 probes from 4 region(s) reached the typesafe API in the last 72 hours.
Earlier days with TypeSafe incidents: Sep 24 (status page) · Sep 23 (status page) · Sep 21 (status page)
Show this live in your README: — embed code
What TypeSafe’s own status page reported
Nothing. TypeSafe’s status page lists no incident in the last 72 hours (checked Sep 27, 14:17 UTC).
Is typesafe getting faster or slower?
hourly p50 latency all probes succeeded some probes failed half or more failed no data
typesafe — hourly p50 edge latency (ms) and probe outcomes per region, last 72 hours Sep 25 Sep 26 Sep 27 now Sep 24, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 24, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 24, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 24, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 24, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 24, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 24, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 24, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 24, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 25, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 26, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): no successful probe
US (Central): no successful probe
Asia (Tokyo): no successful probe
South America (São Paulo): no successful probe Sep 27, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): 297 ms · model requests 1/1 ok
US (Central): 108 ms · model requests 1/1 ok
Asia (Tokyo): 143 ms · model requests 1/1 ok
South America (São Paulo): 236 ms · model requests 1/1 ok Sep 27, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): 231 ms · model requests 3/3 ok
US (Central): 110 ms · model requests 3/3 ok
Asia (Tokyo): 147 ms · model requests 3/3 ok
South America (São Paulo): 246 ms · model requests 3/3 ok Sep 27, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): 294 ms · model requests 1/1 ok
US (Central): 125 ms · model requests 1/1 ok
Asia (Tokyo): 147 ms · model requests 1/1 ok
South America (São Paulo): 260 ms · model requests 1/1 ok 400 0 Sep 24, 15:00 – Sep 27, 11:00 UTC: no probes recorded Sep 27, 12:00 – Sep 27, 14:00 UTC: all 20 probes succeeded host Sep 24, 15:00 – Sep 27, 11:00 UTC: no probes recorded Sep 27, 12:00 – Sep 27, 14:00 UTC: all 5 probes succeeded model 400 0 Sep 24, 15:00 – Sep 27, 11:00 UTC: no probes recorded Sep 27, 12:00 – Sep 27, 14:00 UTC: all 18 probes succeeded host Sep 24, 15:00 – Sep 27, 11:00 UTC: no probes recorded Sep 27, 12:00 – Sep 27, 14:00 UTC: all 5 probes succeeded model 400 0 Sep 24, 15:00 – Sep 27, 11:00 UTC: no probes recorded Sep 27, 12:00 – Sep 27, 14:00 UTC: all 18 probes succeeded host Sep 24, 15:00 – Sep 27, 11:00 UTC: no probes recorded Sep 27, 12:00 – Sep 27, 14:00 UTC: all 5 probes succeeded model 400 0 Sep 24, 15:00 – Sep 27, 11:00 UTC: no probes recorded Sep 27, 12:00 – Sep 27, 14:00 UTC: all 18 probes succeeded host Sep 24, 15:00 – Sep 27, 11:00 UTC: no probes recorded Sep 27, 12:00 – Sep 27, 14:00 UTC: all 5 probes succeeded model Europe (Germany) now 294 ms · typical 294 ms US (Central) now 125 ms · typical 110 ms Asia (Tokyo) now 147 ms · typical 147 ms South America (São Paulo) now 260 ms · typical 246 ms One panel per region: the line is the hourly p50 edge latency (shared scale, ms), the strips beneath it are the outcome of that hour’s host probes and, below them, of the real requests to jev-1.13.0. Hover any hour for the numbers. Flat is good; a rising line means the endpoint is slowing down from that origin, a gap means no probe succeeded in that hour.
How fast is the typesafe API from each region?
Region p50 TTFB p95 Uptime Asia (Tokyo) 147 ms 155 ms 100% Europe (Germany) 284 ms 299 ms 100% South America (São Paulo) 248 ms 267 ms 100% US (Central) 111 ms 128 ms 100%
Measured from US (Central), typesafe responds in 111 ms; from Europe (Germany) the same API takes 284 ms — 2.6× longer for an identical request. That difference is the network path, not the model, and it applies to every call you make.
What is actually being measured here?
A probe in each region opens a real connection to typesafe’s own API host every five
minutes and times DNS resolution, the TCP handshake, the TLS handshake and the first byte of the
response. Nothing is routed through a gateway or aggregator, so these figures describe
typesafe’s infrastructure rather than a reseller’s. Uptime counts a probe as failed only when the
service genuinely fails — a 401 from an unauthenticated probe means the endpoint answered
correctly and is counted as up.
What this page does not tell you
These are edge latency numbers: the time before the model begins generating. They
say nothing about answer quality, throughput, price, or how long a full completion takes — those
depend on the model you call. Edge latency matters because it is unavoidable: it is paid on every
request, before a single token exists, and no prompt engineering removes it. Where an API key is
available, inference time-to-first-token is measured separately and shown on the region pages with the
model named next to the figure. Likewise, an unauthenticated probe cannot see errors that hit only some
models or some accounts — the kind a status page usually reports — which is why TypeSafe’s
own reports are shown next to the measurements rather than folded into them.
How does typesafe compare to other providers?
Independent, provider-neutral measurements. Updated automatically.
Method: distributed probes measure DNS→TCP→TLS→first-byte (edge latency) per region on a schedule.
Rankings are edge latency (TTFB); inference TTFT is shown separately where measured.
Think a number here is wrong? Tell us — contact@llmlatency.dev . Weekly latency report · llms.txt · API · RSS