Is the stepfun API down? Live status, latency & uptime by region
Last verified October 21, 2026 · rebuilt about every 30 minutes
Is the stepfun API down right now? Reachable from all 4 regions
Last successful probe Oct 21, 20:16 UTC · every 5 minutes from 4 region(s)
There was an outage: on Oct 19, 23:15 UTC, host probes failed from 2 of 4 regions simultaneously for under one 5-minute probe cycle. No other provider failed in that window, so a shared route or CDN does not explain it. Measured from outside stepfun’s own network, independently of its status page; full log: measured AI API incidents .
Real requests: not measured for stepfun — only the API host is probed here, so errors limited to specific models are invisible to these probes. That is exactly what a status page tends to report, hence the line below.
stepfun publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to cross-check against.
As of October 21, 2026, the stepfun AI API responds in 346 ms p50 (edge, time-to-first-byte) from Asia (Tokyo) — its fastest measured region — with 100% uptime. Slowest is South America (São Paulo) at 659 ms p50.
Endpoint response (TTFB), 24 h
346 ms
Typical (p50) from Asia (Tokyo), the fastest region
Uptime, 24 h
99.9%
1,153 probes across 4 region(s)
Failed probes, 72 h
40
of 3,459 · US (Central), Asia (Tokyo), South America (São Paulo)
Reported by stepfun, 72 h
—
no machine-readable status page
Was stepfun down in the last 3 days?
Yes. 1 outage(s) could be attributed to stepfun in the last 72 hours: probes failed from two or more regions at once while no other provider was failing.
Oct 21, 05:45 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 15:05 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 14:40 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 11:55 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · at least 10 minutes · 2 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 06:15 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 03:55 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 19, 23:15 UTC Outage — 2 of 4 regions (Asia (Tokyo), US (Central)) · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 2 failed probe(s) · timeoutOct 19, 20:45 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 19, 20:20 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · at least 10 minutes · 2 failed probe(s) · [Errno 101] Network is unreachable; timeout Oct 19, 19:45 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 19, 19:25 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 19, 19:00 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
Earlier days with stepfun incidents: Oct 19 (1 outage) · Oct 10 (1 outage) · Sep 26 (1 outage)
Show this live in your README: — embed code
What stepfun’s own status page reported
stepfun publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to set against the measurements above.
Is stepfun getting faster or slower?
Endpoint response (TTFB) · milliseconds · lower is faster
Last 72 hours · UTC · newest time on the right · current hour is incomplete.
Each line shows a region’s typical response per hour (p50), using the same scale. A gap means no successful timed probe in that hour.
typical response per hour (p50) all probes succeeded some failed (under half) half or more failed no probes recorded
stepfun — hourly p50 edge latency (ms) and probe outcomes per region, last 72 hours Endpoint response time in milliseconds. Lower is faster. Each region uses the same vertical scale from 0 to 3000 ms. Lines show hourly p50 values; gaps have no successful timed probes. Outcome counts are listed after this chart. Oct 19 Oct 20 Oct 21 now Oct 18, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 445 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 374 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 318 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 627 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failed Oct 18, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 442 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 371 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 318 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 657 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 18, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 398 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 367 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 314 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 643 ms (p50 TTFB) · 4 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 405 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 380 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 322 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 728 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 441 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 422 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 339 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 1751 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 470 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 396 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 324 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 658 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 469 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 379 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 340 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 658 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 433 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 397 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 330 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 655 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 452 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 412 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 341 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 696 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 435 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 410 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 339 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 658 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 434 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 410 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 345 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 665 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 454 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 393 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 344 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 649 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 417 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 397 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 332 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 667 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 446 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 411 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 325 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 666 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 471 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 381 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 342 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 648 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 499 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 401 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 329 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 652 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 427 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 380 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 328 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 681 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 454 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 395 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 344 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 694 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 470 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 396 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 335 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 1363 ms (p50 TTFB) · 6 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 456 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 393 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 336 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 641 ms (p50 TTFB) · 5 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 407 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 377 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 318 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 634 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 406 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 374 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 317 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 657 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 409 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 372 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 318 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 641 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 407 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 376 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 319 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 640 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 408 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 368 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 318 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 639 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 408 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 371 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 321 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 648 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 411 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 369 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
Asia (Tokyo): typical 317 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 647 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 402 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 402 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 320 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 661 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 444 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 395 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 338 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 702 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 415 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 400 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 324 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 668 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 451 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 400 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 342 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 662 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 450 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 413 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 318 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 693 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 453 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 1087 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 306 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 693 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 421 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 509 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 305 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 685 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 450 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 471 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 701 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 717 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 452 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 429 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 301 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 708 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 421 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 439 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 302 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 702 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 496 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 455 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 304 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 705 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 452 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 439 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 307 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 705 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 447 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 437 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 318 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 675 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 494 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 939 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 738 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 668 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 458 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 403 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 309 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 668 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 460 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 1008 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 294 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 675 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 495 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 423 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 310 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 659 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 411 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 399 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 305 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 649 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 410 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 379 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 318 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 637 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 446 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 376 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 320 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 640 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 410 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 381 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 318 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 632 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 403 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 377 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 317 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 646 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 412 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 380 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 309 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 654 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 400 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 379 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 294 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 641 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 424 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 410 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 341 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 644 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 469 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 420 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 350 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 661 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 447 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 417 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 349 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 658 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 416 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 422 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 345 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 666 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 472 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 426 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 367 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 667 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 474 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 971 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 365 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 1500 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 21, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 490 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 1023 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 348 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 662 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 470 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 445 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 372 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 660 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 418 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 421 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 679 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 422 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 397 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 365 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 656 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 424 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 402 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 352 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 664 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 394 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 420 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 364 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 681 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 455 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 402 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 357 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 688 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 499 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 420 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 358 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 659 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 417 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 442 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 366 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 1527 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 466 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 411 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 841 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 683 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 498 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 402 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 345 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 670 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 411 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 394 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 666 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 399 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 401 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 306 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 648 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 440 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 379 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 316 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 638 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 396 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 379 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 315 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 647 ms (p50 TTFB) 3000 0 Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 858 probes succeeded 3000 0 Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 19, 22:00 UTC: all 312 probes succeeded Oct 19, 23:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 00:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 532 probes succeeded 3000 0 Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 19, 22:00 UTC: all 312 probes succeeded Oct 19, 23:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 00:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 532 probes succeeded 3000 0 Oct 18, 21:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 18, 22:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 18, 23:00 UTC: 4 of 12 probes failed — [Errno 101] Network is unreachable Oct 19, 00:00 – Oct 19, 05:00 UTC: all 72 probes succeeded Oct 19, 06:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 07:00 – Oct 19, 12:00 UTC: all 72 probes succeeded Oct 19, 13:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 14:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 15:00 UTC: 6 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 16:00 UTC: 5 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 17:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 18:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 19:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 20:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — [Errno 101] Network is unreachable,timeout Oct 19, 21:00 – Oct 20, 02:00 UTC: all 72 probes succeeded Oct 20, 03:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 04:00 – Oct 20, 05:00 UTC: all 24 probes succeeded Oct 20, 06:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 07:00 – Oct 20, 10:00 UTC: all 48 probes succeeded Oct 20, 11:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 12:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 13:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 20, 14:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 15:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 16:00 – Oct 21, 04:00 UTC: all 156 probes succeeded Oct 21, 05:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 21, 06:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 172 probes succeeded Europe (Germany) latest 396 · median 442 ms US (Central) latest 379 · median 401 ms Asia (Tokyo) latest 315 · median 326 ms South America (São Paulo) latest 647 · median 662 ms Probe counts by region Europe (Germany) : 0 failed / 858 endpoint probesUS (Central) : 1 failed / 856 endpoint probesAsia (Tokyo) : 1 failed / 856 endpoint probesSouth America (São Paulo) : 37 failed / 856 endpoint probes
Chart details The strip shows endpoint probe outcomes, not model-request success. Adjacent hours with all successes or no data are joined. Hover an hour for its recorded values.
Latest is the most recent hourly p50 with data. Median is the median of hourly p50 values over these 72 hours. The “slower than usual” label means latest is at least 25% above that median; it is a relative change, not a fixed speed rating.
How fast is the stepfun API from each region?
Endpoint response (TTFB) · last 24 hours · milliseconds (ms) · lower is faster.
How to read these metrics Endpoint response (TTFB) Network connection and the first response byte, without model inference.
Typical · p50 50% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
Slower · p95 95% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
Region Typical (p50 TTFB) Slower (p95) Uptime Asia (Tokyo) 346 ms 960 ms 100% Europe (Germany) 419 ms 1099 ms 100% South America (São Paulo) 659 ms 1664 ms 99.7% US (Central) 403 ms 1079 ms 100%
Measured from Asia (Tokyo), stepfun responds in 346 ms; from South America (São Paulo) the same API takes 659 ms — 1.9× longer for an identical request. That difference is the network path, not the model, and it applies to every call you make.
What is actually being measured here?
A probe in each region opens a real connection to stepfun’s own API host every five
minutes and times DNS resolution, the TCP handshake, the TLS handshake and the first byte of the
response. Nothing is routed through a gateway or aggregator, so these figures describe
stepfun’s infrastructure rather than a reseller’s. Uptime counts a probe as failed only when the
service genuinely fails — a 401 from an unauthenticated probe means the endpoint answered
correctly and is counted as up.
What this page does not tell you
These are edge latency numbers: the time before the model begins generating. They
say nothing about answer quality, throughput, price, or how long a full completion takes — those
depend on the model you call. Edge latency matters because it is unavoidable: it is paid on every
request, before a single token exists, and no prompt engineering removes it. Where an API key is
available, inference time-to-first-token is measured separately and shown on the region pages with the
model named next to the figure. Likewise, an unauthenticated probe cannot see errors that hit only some
models or some accounts — the kind a status page usually reports — which is why stepfun’s
own reports are shown next to the measurements rather than folded into them.