Is the sarvam API down? Live status, latency & uptime by region
Last verified October 21, 2026 · rebuilt about every 30 minutes
Is the sarvam API down right now? Reachable from all 4 regions
Last successful probe Oct 21, 20:16 UTC · every 5 minutes from 4 region(s)
3 isolated failure(s) in the last 72 hours, the most recent (host probes) visible from only one region (South America (São Paulo)). A single-region failure cannot be separated from a problem on that network path, so it is not called an outage. Measured from outside sarvam’s own network, independently of its status page; full log: measured AI API incidents .
Real requests: not measured for sarvam — only the API host is probed here, so errors limited to specific models are invisible to these probes. That is exactly what a status page tends to report, hence the line below.
sarvam publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to cross-check against.
As of October 21, 2026, the sarvam AI API responds in 252 ms p50 (edge, time-to-first-byte) from Asia (Tokyo) — its fastest measured region — with 100% uptime. Slowest is South America (São Paulo) at 626 ms p50.
Endpoint response (TTFB), 24 h
252 ms
Typical (p50) from Asia (Tokyo), the fastest region
Uptime, 24 h
99.7%
1,153 probes across 4 region(s)
Failed probes, 72 h
4
of 3,459 · South America (São Paulo)
Reported by sarvam, 72 h
—
no machine-readable status page
Was sarvam down in the last 3 days?
No. 3 isolated single-region probe failure(s) were recorded, none of which meets the bar for an outage (two or more regions at once).
Oct 21, 19:01 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · at least 10 minutes · 2 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 21, 17:31 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 18:15 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
Earlier days with sarvam incidents: Sep 30 (1 outage) · Aug 18 (1 outage) · Jul 30 (1 outage)
Show this live in your README: — embed code
What sarvam’s own status page reported
sarvam publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to set against the measurements above.
Is sarvam getting faster or slower?
Endpoint response (TTFB) · milliseconds · lower is faster
Last 72 hours · UTC · newest time on the right · current hour is incomplete.
Each line shows a region’s typical response per hour (p50), using the same scale. A gap means no successful timed probe in that hour.
typical response per hour (p50) all probes succeeded some failed (under half) half or more failed no probes recorded
sarvam — hourly p50 edge latency (ms) and probe outcomes per region, last 72 hours Endpoint response time in milliseconds. Lower is faster. Each region uses the same vertical scale from 0 to 800 ms. Lines show hourly p50 values; gaps have no successful timed probes. Outcome counts are listed after this chart. Oct 19 Oct 20 Oct 21 now Oct 18, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 423 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 624 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 18, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 298 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 427 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 18, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 293 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 424 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 629 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 432 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 245 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 624 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 426 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 623 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 293 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 429 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 622 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 271 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 434 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 623 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 424 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 629 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 429 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 629 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 428 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 240 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 627 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 431 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 629 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 298 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 438 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 630 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 295 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 424 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 271 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 431 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 625 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 298 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 418 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 622 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 427 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 629 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 431 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 432 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 623 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 428 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 628 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 484 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 624 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 295 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 498 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 625 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 269 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 503 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 629 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 487 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 625 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 273 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 499 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 292 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 497 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 249 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 624 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 498 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 625 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 295 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 488 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 629 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 299 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 501 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 633 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 498 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 625 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 294 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 510 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 623 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 500 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 250 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 623 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 298 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 510 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 249 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 629 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 500 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 253 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 624 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 508 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 624 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 495 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 630 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 500 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 253 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 295 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 500 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 253 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 628 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 298 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 501 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 624 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 503 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 250 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 627 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 300 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 495 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 625 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 506 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 507 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 622 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 504 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 502 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 250 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 625 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 502 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 255 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 625 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 295 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 502 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 254 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 632 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 292 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 504 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 257 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 623 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 507 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 295 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 503 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 627 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 510 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 632 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 294 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 510 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 250 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 641 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 268 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 511 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 628 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 299 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 490 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 623 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 497 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 623 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 500 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 630 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 295 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 510 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 253 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 625 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 491 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 253 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 630 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 299 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 503 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 244 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 294 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 507 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 628 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 271 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 502 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 633 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 492 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 255 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 629 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 267 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 484 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 254 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 507 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 253 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 630 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 295 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 494 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 254 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 624 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 490 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 253 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 624 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 298 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 504 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 254 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 278 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 504 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 253 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 627 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 298 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 501 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 254 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 511 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 253 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 628 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 21, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 498 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 626 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 296 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 506 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 623 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed Oct 21, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 297 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 485 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 254 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 631 ms (p50 TTFB) 800 0 Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 858 probes succeeded 800 0 Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 856 probes succeeded 800 0 Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 856 probes succeeded 800 0 Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 20, 17:00 UTC: all 540 probes succeeded Oct 20, 18:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 19:00 – Oct 21, 16:00 UTC: all 265 probes succeeded Oct 21, 17:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 21, 18:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 21, 19:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 3 probes succeeded Europe (Germany) latest 297 · median 296 ms US (Central) latest 485 · median 498 ms Asia (Tokyo) latest 254 · median 251 ms South America (São Paulo) latest 631 · median 626 ms Probe counts by region Europe (Germany) : 0 failed / 858 endpoint probesUS (Central) : 0 failed / 856 endpoint probesAsia (Tokyo) : 0 failed / 856 endpoint probesSouth America (São Paulo) : 4 failed / 856 endpoint probes
Chart details The strip shows endpoint probe outcomes, not model-request success. Adjacent hours with all successes or no data are joined. Hover an hour for its recorded values.
Latest is the most recent hourly p50 with data. Median is the median of hourly p50 values over these 72 hours. The “slower than usual” label means latest is at least 25% above that median; it is a relative change, not a fixed speed rating.
How fast is the sarvam API from each region?
Endpoint response (TTFB) · last 24 hours · milliseconds (ms) · lower is faster.
How to read these metrics Endpoint response (TTFB) Network connection and the first response byte, without model inference.
Typical · p50 50% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
Slower · p95 95% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
Region Typical (p50 TTFB) Slower (p95) Uptime Asia (Tokyo) 252 ms 258 ms 100% Europe (Germany) 295 ms 308 ms 100% South America (São Paulo) 626 ms 659 ms 99.0% US (Central) 499 ms 525 ms 100%
Measured from Asia (Tokyo), sarvam responds in 252 ms; from South America (São Paulo) the same API takes 626 ms — 2.5× longer for an identical request. That difference is the network path, not the model, and it applies to every call you make.
What is actually being measured here?
A probe in each region opens a real connection to sarvam’s own API host every five
minutes and times DNS resolution, the TCP handshake, the TLS handshake and the first byte of the
response. Nothing is routed through a gateway or aggregator, so these figures describe
sarvam’s infrastructure rather than a reseller’s. Uptime counts a probe as failed only when the
service genuinely fails — a 401 from an unauthenticated probe means the endpoint answered
correctly and is counted as up.
What this page does not tell you
These are edge latency numbers: the time before the model begins generating. They
say nothing about answer quality, throughput, price, or how long a full completion takes — those
depend on the model you call. Edge latency matters because it is unavoidable: it is paid on every
request, before a single token exists, and no prompt engineering removes it. Where an API key is
available, inference time-to-first-token is measured separately and shown on the region pages with the
model named next to the figure. Likewise, an unauthenticated probe cannot see errors that hit only some
models or some accounts — the kind a status page usually reports — which is why sarvam’s
own reports are shown next to the measurements rather than folded into them.