Is the meta-llama API down? Live status, latency & uptime by region
Last verified October 21, 2026 · rebuilt about every 30 minutes
Is the meta-llama API down right now? Reachable from all 4 regions
Last successful probe Oct 21, 20:16 UTC · every 5 minutes from 4 region(s)
Every probe from every region reached the meta-llama API successfully in the last 72 hours. Measured from outside meta-llama’s own network, independently of its status page; full log: measured AI API incidents .
Real requests: not measured for meta-llama — only the API host is probed here, so errors limited to specific models are invisible to these probes. That is exactly what a status page tends to report, hence the line below.
meta-llama publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to cross-check against.
As of October 21, 2026, the meta-llama AI API responds in 58 ms p50 (edge, time-to-first-byte) from US (Central) — its fastest measured region — with 100% uptime. Slowest is South America (São Paulo) at 221 ms p50.
Endpoint response (TTFB), 24 h
58 ms
Typical (p50) from US (Central), the fastest region
Uptime, 24 h
100%
1,152 probes across 4 region(s)
Failed probes, 72 h
0
of 3,459 probes, all regions
Reported by meta-llama, 72 h
—
no machine-readable status page
Was meta-llama down in the last 3 days?
No. All 3,459 probes from 4 region(s) reached the meta-llama API in the last 72 hours.
Show this live in your README: — embed code
What meta-llama’s own status page reported
meta-llama publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to set against the measurements above.
Is meta-llama getting faster or slower?
Endpoint response (TTFB) · milliseconds · lower is faster
Last 72 hours · UTC · newest time on the right · current hour is incomplete.
Each line shows a region’s typical response per hour (p50), using the same scale. A gap means no successful timed probe in that hour.
typical response per hour (p50) all probes succeeded some failed (under half) half or more failed no probes recorded
meta-llama — hourly p50 edge latency (ms) and probe outcomes per region, last 72 hours Endpoint response time in milliseconds. Lower is faster. Each region uses the same vertical scale from 0 to 300 ms. Lines show hourly p50 values; gaps have no successful timed probes. Outcome counts are listed after this chart. Oct 19 Oct 20 Oct 21 now Oct 18, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 104 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 69 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 138 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 18, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 99 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 76 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 120 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 137 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 18, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 100 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 74 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 132 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 95 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 80 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 123 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 154 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 103 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 83 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 123 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 155 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 59 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 110 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 237 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 100 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 50 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 122 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 254 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 101 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 69 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 122 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 240 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 99 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 53 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 132 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 135 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 98 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 50 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 116 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 241 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 48 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 115 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 238 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 98 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 49 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 118 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 250 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 56 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 121 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 148 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 57 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 115 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 232 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 98 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 41 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 115 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 154 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 46 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 127 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 238 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 99 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 56 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 264 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 99 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 120 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 154 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 231 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 96 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 122 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 115 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 237 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 99 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 54 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 130 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 242 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 99 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 61 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 128 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 242 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 104 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 134 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 137 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 235 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 97 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 125 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 133 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 227 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 98 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 97 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 110 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 213 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 100 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 57 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 116 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 158 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 98 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 60 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 128 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 141 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 68 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 125 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 221 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 103 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 88 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 115 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 249 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 46 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 142 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 234 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 100 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 50 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 122 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 153 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 43 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 113 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 155 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 100 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 55 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 118 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 141 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 51 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 109 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 156 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 50 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 114 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 181 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 98 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 44 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 120 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 147 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 98 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 62 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 121 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 216 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 105 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 55 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 112 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 151 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 105 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 62 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 120 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 240 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 96 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 47 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 122 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 234 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 104 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 57 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 116 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 226 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 99 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 107 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 117 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 236 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 104 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 72 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 110 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 235 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 100 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 55 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 115 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 233 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 101 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 68 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 128 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 231 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 97 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 66 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 133 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 168 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 106 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 58 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 133 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 226 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 100 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 63 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 111 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 235 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 103 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 78 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 127 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 106 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 85 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 118 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 240 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 100 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 67 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 119 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 145 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 103 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 64 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 132 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 231 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 61 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 112 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 237 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 100 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 78 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 110 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 221 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 99 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 60 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 111 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 243 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 103 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 51 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 112 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 244 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 96 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 62 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 122 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 168 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 196 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 64 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 115 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 174 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 62 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 115 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 250 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 99 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 57 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 112 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 185 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 61 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 121 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 220 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 101 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 44 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 146 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 156 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 101 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 48 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 113 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 218 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 99 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 65 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 144 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 244 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 96 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 56 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 119 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 169 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 66 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 120 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 221 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 103 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 59 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 115 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 100 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 48 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 120 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 162 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 98 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 62 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 118 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 226 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 104 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 61 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 111 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 102 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 52 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 111 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 167 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 98 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 45 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 110 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 236 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 99 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 39 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 110 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 239 ms (p50 TTFB) 300 0 Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 858 probes succeeded 300 0 Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 856 probes succeeded 300 0 Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 856 probes succeeded 300 0 Oct 18, 21:00 – Oct 21, 20:00 UTC: all 856 probes succeeded Europe (Germany) latest 99 · median 100 ms US (Central) latest 39 · median 60 ms Asia (Tokyo) latest 110 · median 119 ms South America (São Paulo) latest 239 · median 229 ms Probe counts by region Europe (Germany) : 0 failed / 858 endpoint probesUS (Central) : 0 failed / 856 endpoint probesAsia (Tokyo) : 0 failed / 856 endpoint probesSouth America (São Paulo) : 0 failed / 856 endpoint probes
Chart details The strip shows endpoint probe outcomes, not model-request success. Adjacent hours with all successes or no data are joined. Hover an hour for its recorded values.
Latest is the most recent hourly p50 with data. Median is the median of hourly p50 values over these 72 hours. The “slower than usual” label means latest is at least 25% above that median; it is a relative change, not a fixed speed rating.
How fast is the meta-llama API from each region?
Endpoint response (TTFB) · last 24 hours · milliseconds (ms) · lower is faster.
How to read these metrics Endpoint response (TTFB) Network connection and the first response byte, without model inference.
Typical · p50 50% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
Slower · p95 95% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
Region Typical (p50 TTFB) Slower (p95) Uptime Asia (Tokyo) 114 ms 286 ms 100% Europe (Germany) 100 ms 296 ms 100% South America (São Paulo) 221 ms 374 ms 100% US (Central) 58 ms 121 ms 100%
Measured from US (Central), meta-llama responds in 58 ms; from South America (São Paulo) the same API takes 221 ms — 3.8× longer for an identical request. That difference is the network path, not the model, and it applies to every call you make.
What is actually being measured here?
A probe in each region opens a real connection to meta-llama’s own API host every five
minutes and times DNS resolution, the TCP handshake, the TLS handshake and the first byte of the
response. Nothing is routed through a gateway or aggregator, so these figures describe
meta-llama’s infrastructure rather than a reseller’s. Uptime counts a probe as failed only when the
service genuinely fails — a 401 from an unauthenticated probe means the endpoint answered
correctly and is counted as up.
What this page does not tell you
These are edge latency numbers: the time before the model begins generating. They
say nothing about answer quality, throughput, price, or how long a full completion takes — those
depend on the model you call. Edge latency matters because it is unavoidable: it is paid on every
request, before a single token exists, and no prompt engineering removes it. Where an API key is
available, inference time-to-first-token is measured separately and shown on the region pages with the
model named next to the figure. Likewise, an unauthenticated probe cannot see errors that hit only some
models or some accounts — the kind a status page usually reports — which is why meta-llama’s
own reports are shown next to the measurements rather than folded into them.