Is the doubao API down? Live status, latency & uptime by region
Last verified October 22, 2026 · rebuilt about every 30 minutes
Is the doubao API down right now? Reachable from all 4 regions
Last successful probe Oct 22, 01:46 UTC · every 5 minutes from 4 region(s)
There was an outage: on Oct 19, 08:00 UTC, host probes failed from 3 of 4 regions simultaneously for at least 10 minutes. No other provider failed in that window, so a shared route or CDN does not explain it. Measured from outside doubao’s own network, independently of its status page; full log: measured AI API incidents .
Real requests: not measured for doubao — only the API host is probed here, so errors limited to specific models are invisible to these probes. That is exactly what a status page tends to report, hence the line below.
doubao publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to cross-check against.
As of October 22, 2026, the doubao AI API responds in 360 ms p50 (edge, time-to-first-byte) from Europe (Germany) — its fastest measured region — with 100% uptime. Slowest is South America (São Paulo) at 694 ms p50.
Endpoint response (TTFB), 24 h
360 ms
Typical (p50) from Europe (Germany), the fastest region
Uptime, 24 h
99.8%
1,153 probes across 4 region(s)
Failed probes, 72 h
82
of 3,459 · Europe (Germany), US (Central), Asia (Tokyo), South America (São Paulo)
Reported by doubao, 72 h
—
no machine-readable status page
Was doubao down in the last 3 days?
Yes. 5 outage(s) could be attributed to doubao in the last 72 hours: probes failed from two or more regions at once while no other provider was failing.
Oct 21, 17:06 UTC Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 21, 05:45 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · [Errno 101] Network is unreachable Oct 20, 18:16 UTC 2 of 4 regions (Europe (Germany), US (Central)) — 2 other provider(s) failed in the same minutes, not attributed · at least 14 minutes · 2 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 16:10 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 13:55 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · at least 15 minutes · 2 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 09:20 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 07:35 UTC Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 07:10 UTC 2 of 4 regions (Europe (Germany), South America (São Paulo)) — 1 other provider(s) failed in the same minutes, not attributed · at least 9 minutes · 2 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 05:35 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 03:30 UTC 2 of 4 regions (Asia (Tokyo), Europe (Germany)) — 1 other provider(s) failed in the same minutes, not attributed · at least 20 minutes · 3 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 02:20 UTC 2 of 4 regions (Asia (Tokyo), South America (São Paulo)) — 3 other provider(s) failed in the same minutes, not attributed · at least 15 minutes · 3 failed probe(s) · timeout Oct 20, 01:40 UTC South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · [Errno 101] Network is unreachable
Earlier days with doubao incidents: Oct 19 (5 outages) · Oct 18 (4 outages) · Oct 17 (3 outages) · Oct 16 (1 outage) · Oct 9 (1 outage) · Oct 5 (1 outage) · Oct 3 (1 outage) · Oct 2 (1 outage)
Show this live in your README: — embed code
What doubao’s own status page reported
doubao publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to set against the measurements above.
Is doubao getting faster or slower?
Endpoint response (TTFB) · milliseconds · lower is faster
Last 72 hours · UTC · newest time on the right · current hour is incomplete.
Each line shows a region’s typical response per hour (p50), using the same scale. A gap means no successful timed probe in that hour.
typical response per hour (p50) all probes succeeded some failed (under half) half or more failed no probes recorded
doubao — hourly p50 edge latency (ms) and probe outcomes per region, last 72 hours Endpoint response time in milliseconds. Lower is faster. Each region uses the same vertical scale from 0 to 4000 ms. Lines show hourly p50 values; gaps have no successful timed probes. Outcome counts are listed after this chart. Oct 20 Oct 21 now Oct 19, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 400 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 448 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 570 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 686 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 356 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 451 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 580 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 687 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 395 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 454 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 486 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 692 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 364 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 472 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
Asia (Tokyo): typical 483 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 696 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 394 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 482 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 503 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 699 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 359 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 465 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
Asia (Tokyo): typical 579 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 694 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 357 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 467 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed
Asia (Tokyo): typical 520 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 690 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 394 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 463 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 511 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 686 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 396 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 465 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
Asia (Tokyo): typical 492 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 698 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 361 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 472 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 497 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 698 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 378 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 473 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failed
Asia (Tokyo): typical 586 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 699 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 399 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 465 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 601 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 1577 ms (p50 TTFB) · 4 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 376 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 472 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 580 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 695 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 806 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 1031 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 601 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 1651 ms (p50 TTFB) · 4 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 376 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 459 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
Asia (Tokyo): typical 496 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 3251 ms (p50 TTFB) · 4 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 354 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 467 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 504 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 687 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 352 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 443 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 576 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 682 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 398 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 444 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 471 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 681 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 398 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 450 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 473 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 684 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 19, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 394 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 450 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 571 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 688 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 454 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 467 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 683 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 19, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 349 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 450 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 473 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 685 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 397 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 463 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 477 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 688 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 395 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 454 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 573 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 695 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 360 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 469 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 488 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 695 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 364 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 463 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 490 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 702 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 398 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 469 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 572 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 698 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 398 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 529 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 486 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 715 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 399 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 540 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 490 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 699 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 378 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 14 probes failed
US (Central): typical 538 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 587 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 712 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 360 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 1143 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 503 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 734 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 370 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 489 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 506 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 701 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 365 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 489 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 499 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 708 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 360 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 488 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 603 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 736 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 401 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 489 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 601 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 703 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 400 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 496 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 597 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 716 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 400 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 497 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 1105 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 703 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 396 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 475 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 579 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 705 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 400 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 469 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 583 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 693 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 20, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 351 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 470 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 580 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 686 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 394 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
US (Central): typical 447 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
Asia (Tokyo): typical 469 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 681 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 352 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 453 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 467 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 688 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 349 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 449 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 480 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 684 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 445 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 463 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 683 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 445 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 471 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 682 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 20, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 354 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 463 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 469 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 686 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 398 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 453 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 574 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 688 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 398 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 459 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 569 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 689 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 02:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 398 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 463 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 577 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 691 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 03:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 398 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 466 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 487 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 687 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 04:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 373 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 466 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 588 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 695 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 05:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 370 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 492 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 499 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 702 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed Oct 21, 06:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 358 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 489 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 593 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 694 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 07:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 395 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 1080 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 588 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 699 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 08:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 360 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 490 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 578 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 716 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 09:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 348 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 466 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 594 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 714 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 10:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 340 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 468 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 494 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 699 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 11:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 398 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 457 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 598 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 707 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 12:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 760 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 475 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 612 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 735 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 13:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 496 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 485 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 500 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 710 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 14:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 361 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 477 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 517 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 714 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 15:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 392 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 463 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 1083 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 731 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 16:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 395 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 472 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 489 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 697 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 17:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 352 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 454 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 461 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed
South America (São Paulo): typical 694 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 18:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 450 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 472 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 684 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 19:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 449 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 479 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 685 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 20:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 354 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 442 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 471 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 683 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 21:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 352 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 448 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 472 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 683 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 22:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 331 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 448 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 480 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 688 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 21, 23:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 396 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 453 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 471 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 688 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 22, 00:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 452 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 463 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 689 ms (p50 TTFB) Oct 22, 01:00 UTC
Europe (Germany): typical 358 ms (p50 TTFB)
US (Central): typical 454 ms (p50 TTFB)
Asia (Tokyo): typical 570 ms (p50 TTFB)
South America (São Paulo): typical 685 ms (p50 TTFB) 4000 0 Oct 19, 02:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 03:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 04:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 05:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 06:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 07:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 08:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 09:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 10:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 11:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 12:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 13:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 14:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 15:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 16:00 – Oct 20, 02:00 UTC: all 132 probes succeeded Oct 20, 03:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 04:00 – Oct 20, 06:00 UTC: all 36 probes succeeded Oct 20, 07:00 UTC: 1 of 14 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 08:00 – Oct 20, 17:00 UTC: all 121 probes succeeded Oct 20, 18:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 19:00 – Oct 22, 01:00 UTC: all 369 probes succeeded 4000 0 Oct 19, 02:00 – Oct 19, 04:00 UTC: all 36 probes succeeded Oct 19, 05:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 06:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 07:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 08:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 09:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 10:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 11:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 12:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 13:00 – Oct 19, 15:00 UTC: all 36 probes succeeded Oct 19, 16:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 17:00 – Oct 20, 17:00 UTC: all 300 probes succeeded Oct 20, 18:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 19:00 – Oct 22, 01:00 UTC: all 370 probes succeeded 4000 0 Oct 19, 02:00 – Oct 19, 03:00 UTC: all 24 probes succeeded Oct 19, 04:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 05:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 06:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 07:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 08:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 09:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 10:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 11:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 12:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 13:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 14:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 15:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 16:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 17:00 – Oct 20, 01:00 UTC: all 108 probes succeeded Oct 20, 02:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 03:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 04:00 – Oct 20, 06:00 UTC: all 36 probes succeeded Oct 20, 07:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 08:00 – Oct 21, 16:00 UTC: all 397 probes succeeded Oct 21, 17:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 21, 18:00 – Oct 22, 01:00 UTC: all 93 probes succeeded 4000 0 Oct 19, 02:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 03:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 04:00 – Oct 19, 05:00 UTC: all 24 probes succeeded Oct 19, 06:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 07:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 08:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 09:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 10:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 11:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 12:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 19, 13:00 UTC: 4 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 14:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 15:00 UTC: 4 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 16:00 UTC: 4 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 17:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 18:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 19:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 20:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 19, 21:00 – Oct 19, 23:00 UTC: all 36 probes succeeded Oct 20, 00:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 01:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout,[Errno 101] Network is unreachable Oct 20, 02:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 03:00 – Oct 20, 04:00 UTC: all 24 probes succeeded Oct 20, 05:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 06:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 20, 07:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 08:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 20, 09:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 10:00 – Oct 20, 12:00 UTC: all 36 probes succeeded Oct 20, 13:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 14:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 15:00 UTC: all 12 probes succeeded Oct 20, 16:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeout Oct 20, 17:00 – Oct 21, 04:00 UTC: all 144 probes succeeded Oct 21, 05:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — [Errno 101] Network is unreachable Oct 21, 06:00 – Oct 22, 01:00 UTC: all 238 probes succeeded Europe (Germany) latest 358 · median 374 ms US (Central) latest 454 · median 465 ms Asia (Tokyo) latest 570 · median 504 ms South America (São Paulo) latest 685 · median 695 ms Probe counts by region Europe (Germany) : 18 failed / 864 endpoint probesUS (Central) : 10 failed / 862 endpoint probesAsia (Tokyo) : 16 failed / 862 endpoint probesSouth America (São Paulo) : 38 failed / 862 endpoint probes
Chart details The strip shows endpoint probe outcomes, not model-request success. Adjacent hours with all successes or no data are joined. Hover an hour for its recorded values.
Latest is the most recent hourly p50 with data. Median is the median of hourly p50 values over these 72 hours. The “slower than usual” label means latest is at least 25% above that median; it is a relative change, not a fixed speed rating.
How fast is the doubao API from each region?
Endpoint response (TTFB) · last 24 hours · milliseconds (ms) · lower is faster.
How to read these metrics Endpoint response (TTFB) Network connection and the first response byte, without model inference.
Typical · p50 50% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
Slower · p95 95% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
Region Typical (p50 TTFB) Slower (p95) Uptime Asia (Tokyo) 493 ms 1223 ms 99.7% Europe (Germany) 360 ms 823 ms 100% South America (São Paulo) 694 ms 1598 ms 99.7% US (Central) 464 ms 1122 ms 100%
Measured from Europe (Germany), doubao responds in 360 ms; from South America (São Paulo) the same API takes 694 ms — 1.9× longer for an identical request. That difference is the network path, not the model, and it applies to every call you make.
What is actually being measured here?
A probe in each region opens a real connection to doubao’s own API host every five
minutes and times DNS resolution, the TCP handshake, the TLS handshake and the first byte of the
response. Nothing is routed through a gateway or aggregator, so these figures describe
doubao’s infrastructure rather than a reseller’s. Uptime counts a probe as failed only when the
service genuinely fails — a 401 from an unauthenticated probe means the endpoint answered
correctly and is counted as up.
What this page does not tell you
These are edge latency numbers: the time before the model begins generating. They
say nothing about answer quality, throughput, price, or how long a full completion takes — those
depend on the model you call. Edge latency matters because it is unavoidable: it is paid on every
request, before a single token exists, and no prompt engineering removes it. Where an API key is
available, inference time-to-first-token is measured separately and shown on the region pages with the
model named next to the figure. Likewise, an unauthenticated probe cannot see errors that hit only some
models or some accounts — the kind a status page usually reports — which is why doubao’s
own reports are shown next to the measurements rather than folded into them.