HomeProvider details
Data API

Is the baichuan API down? Live status, latency & uptime by region

· rebuilt about every 30 minutes

Is the baichuan API down right now?

Reachable from all 4 regions

Last successful probe Oct 21, 22:16 UTC · every 5 minutes from 4 region(s)

10 isolated failure(s) in the last 72 hours, the most recent (host probes) visible from only one region (Asia (Tokyo)). A single-region failure cannot be separated from a problem on that network path, so it is not called an outage. Measured from outside baichuan’s own network, independently of its status page; full log: measured AI API incidents.

Real requests: not measured for baichuan — only the API host is probed here, so errors limited to specific models are invisible to these probes. That is exactly what a status page tends to report, hence the line below.

baichuan publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to cross-check against.

As of October 21, 2026, the baichuan AI API responds in 141 ms p50 (edge, time-to-first-byte) from Asia (Tokyo) — its fastest measured region — with 99.3% uptime. Slowest is South America (São Paulo) at 360 ms p50.

Endpoint response (TTFB), 24 h
141 ms
Typical (p50) from Asia (Tokyo), the fastest region
Uptime, 24 h
99.8%
1,152 probes across 4 region(s)
Failed probes, 72 h
22
of 3,459 · Europe (Germany), Asia (Tokyo), South America (São Paulo)
Reported by baichuan, 72 h
—
no machine-readable status page

Was baichuan down in the last 3 days?

No. 10 isolated single-region probe failure(s) were recorded, none of which meets the bar for an outage (two or more regions at once).

  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Europe (Germany) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • Asia (Tokyo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · under one 5-minute probe cycle · 1 failed probe(s) · timeout
  • South America (São Paulo) only — not an outage · at least 80 minutes · 13 failed probe(s) · [Errno 101] Network is unreachable

Show this live in your README: baichuan API status badge — embed code

What baichuan’s own status page reported

baichuan publishes no machine-readable status page, so there is nothing to set against the measurements above.

Is baichuan getting faster or slower?

Endpoint response (TTFB) · milliseconds · lower is faster

Last 72 hours · UTC · newest time on the right · current hour is incomplete.

Each line shows a region’s typical response per hour (p50), using the same scale. A gap means no successful timed probe in that hour.

typical response per hour (p50)all probes succeededsome failed (under half)half or more failedno probes recorded

baichuan — hourly p50 edge latency (ms) and probe outcomes per region, last 72 hoursEndpoint response time in milliseconds. Lower is faster. Each region uses the same vertical scale from 0 to 500 ms. Lines show hourly p50 values; gaps have no successful timed probes. Outcome counts are listed after this chart.Oct 19Oct 20Oct 21nowOct 18, 23:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 224 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 138 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 344 ms (p50 TTFB) · 9 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 00:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 229 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 139 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 360 ms (p50 TTFB) · 3 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 01:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 196 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 231 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 147 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 364 ms (p50 TTFB) · 2 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 02:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 196 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 237 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 147 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 364 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 03:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 193 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 230 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 136 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 356 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 04:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 182 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 233 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 144 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 352 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 05:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 201 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 235 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 148 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 358 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 06:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 260 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 148 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 362 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 07:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 245 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 147 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 360 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 08:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 243 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 141 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 363 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 09:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 195 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 228 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 143 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 360 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 10:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 197 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 244 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 151 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 366 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 11:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 190 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 232 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 151 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 366 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 12:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 241 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 138 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 364 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 13:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 201 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 233 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 150 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 355 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 14:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 238 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 139 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 362 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failedOct 19, 15:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 243 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 139 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 359 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 16:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 182 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 237 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 140 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 356 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 17:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 228 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 145 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 342 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 18:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 229 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 137 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 350 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 19:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 197 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 225 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 137 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 354 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 20:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 226 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 132 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 350 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 21:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 192 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 233 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 130 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 370 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 22:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 225 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 141 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 348 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 19, 23:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 196 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 226 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 129 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 364 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 00:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 236 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 140 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 354 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 01:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 194 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 231 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 141 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 363 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 02:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 144 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 359 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 03:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 253 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 154 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 368 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 04:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 186 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 244 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 146 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 363 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 05:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 194 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 249 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 142 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 363 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 06:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 184 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 250 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 152 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 360 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 07:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 241 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 145 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 363 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 08:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 196 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 248 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 153 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 363 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 09:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 141 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 370 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 10:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 195 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 247 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 138 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 361 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 11:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 241 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 140 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 366 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 12:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 201 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 142 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 375 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 13:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 388 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 369 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 14:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 185 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 242 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 141 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 374 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 15:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 246 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 139 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 367 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 16:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 201 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed US (Central): typical 245 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 152 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 372 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 17:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 235 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 152 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 351 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 18:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 227 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 133 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 345 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 19:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 197 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 226 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 98 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 349 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 20:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 224 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 126 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 352 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 21:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 194 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 232 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 122 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 22:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 243 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 132 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 347 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 20, 23:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 191 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 224 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 133 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 355 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 00:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 234 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 140 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 358 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 01:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 228 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 142 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 357 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 02:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 197 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 229 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 143 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 358 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 03:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 177 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 237 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 143 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 374 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 04:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 231 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 242 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 143 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 352 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 05:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 238 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 157 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 363 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 06:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 194 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 255 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 149 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 368 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 07:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 201 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 252 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 156 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 379 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 08:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 257 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 140 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 372 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 09:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 236 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 142 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 365 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 10:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 195 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 238 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 150 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 356 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 11:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 251 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 138 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 361 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 12:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 184 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 256 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 143 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 366 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 13:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 196 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 256 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 153 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 363 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 14:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 175 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 258 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 141 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 367 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 15:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 177 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 228 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 146 ms (p50 TTFB) · 1 of 12 probes failed South America (São Paulo): typical 362 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 16:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 249 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 149 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 364 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 17:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 200 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 232 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 136 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 354 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 18:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 196 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 232 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 137 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 19:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 227 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 135 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 353 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 20:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 199 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 240 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 133 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 355 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 21:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 196 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 223 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 129 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 356 ms (p50 TTFB)Oct 21, 22:00 UTC Europe (Germany): typical 198 ms (p50 TTFB) US (Central): typical 222 ms (p50 TTFB) Asia (Tokyo): typical 131 ms (p50 TTFB) South America (São Paulo): typical 356 ms (p50 TTFB)5000Oct 18, 23:00 – Oct 20, 15:00 UTC: all 495 probes succeededOct 20, 16:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 17:00 – Oct 21, 22:00 UTC: all 351 probes succeeded5000Oct 18, 23:00 – Oct 21, 22:00 UTC: all 856 probes succeeded5000Oct 18, 23:00 – Oct 19, 14:00 UTC: all 192 probes succeededOct 19, 15:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 16:00 – Oct 20, 08:00 UTC: all 204 probes succeededOct 20, 09:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 20, 10:00 – Oct 21, 10:00 UTC: all 301 probes succeededOct 21, 11:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 12:00 – Oct 21, 14:00 UTC: all 36 probes succeededOct 21, 15:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 21, 16:00 – Oct 21, 22:00 UTC: all 75 probes succeeded5000Oct 18, 23:00 UTC: 9 of 12 probes failed — [Errno 101] Network is unreachableOct 19, 00:00 UTC: 3 of 12 probes failed — [Errno 101] Network is unreachableOct 19, 01:00 UTC: 2 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 02:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 03:00 – Oct 19, 13:00 UTC: all 132 probes succeededOct 19, 14:00 UTC: 1 of 12 probes failed — timeoutOct 19, 15:00 – Oct 21, 22:00 UTC: all 664 probes succeeded
Europe (Germany)latest 198 · median 198 msUS (Central)latest 222 · median 237 msAsia (Tokyo)latest 131 · median 141 msSouth America (São Paulo)latest 356 · median 361 ms
Probe counts by region
Europe (Germany): 1 failed / 858 endpoint probesUS (Central): 0 failed / 856 endpoint probesAsia (Tokyo): 4 failed / 856 endpoint probesSouth America (São Paulo): 16 failed / 856 endpoint probes
Chart details

The strip shows endpoint probe outcomes, not model-request success. Adjacent hours with all successes or no data are joined. Hover an hour for its recorded values.

Latest is the most recent hourly p50 with data. Median is the median of hourly p50 values over these 72 hours. The “slower than usual” label means latest is at least 25% above that median; it is a relative change, not a fixed speed rating.

How fast is the baichuan API from each region?

Endpoint response (TTFB) · last 24 hours · milliseconds (ms) · lower is faster.

How to read these metrics
Endpoint response (TTFB)Network connection and the first response byte, without model inference.
Typical · p5050% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
Slower · p9595% of successful timed samples finish within this time.
RegionTypical (p50 TTFB)Slower (p95)Uptime
Asia (Tokyo)141 ms525 ms99.3%
Europe (Germany)196 ms401 ms100%
South America (São Paulo)360 ms420 ms100%
US (Central)238 ms879 ms100%

Measured from Asia (Tokyo), baichuan responds in 141 ms; from South America (São Paulo) the same API takes 360 ms — 2.6× longer for an identical request. That difference is the network path, not the model, and it applies to every call you make.

What is actually being measured here?

A probe in each region opens a real connection to baichuan’s own API host every five minutes and times DNS resolution, the TCP handshake, the TLS handshake and the first byte of the response. Nothing is routed through a gateway or aggregator, so these figures describe baichuan’s infrastructure rather than a reseller’s. Uptime counts a probe as failed only when the service genuinely fails — a 401 from an unauthenticated probe means the endpoint answered correctly and is counted as up.

What this page does not tell you

These are edge latency numbers: the time before the model begins generating. They say nothing about answer quality, throughput, price, or how long a full completion takes — those depend on the model you call. Edge latency matters because it is unavoidable: it is paid on every request, before a single token exists, and no prompt engineering removes it. Where an API key is available, inference time-to-first-token is measured separately and shown on the region pages with the model named next to the figure. Likewise, an unauthenticated probe cannot see errors that hit only some models or some accounts — the kind a status page usually reports — which is why baichuan’s own reports are shown next to the measurements rather than folded into them.