deepseek vs sambanova — AI API latency comparison
As of July 24, 2026, sambanova has lower edge latency (time-to-first-byte) than deepseek in 3 of 4 measured region(s). From US (Central), sambanova responds in 129 ms p50 vs 309 ms.
Edge latency by region
| Region | deepseek p50 TTFB | sambanova p50 TTFB | Faster |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asia (Tokyo) | 172 ms | 20 ms | sambanova |
| Europe (Germany) | 299 ms | 396 ms | deepseek |
| South America (São Paulo) | 426 ms | 402 ms | sambanova |
| US (Central) | 309 ms | 129 ms | sambanova |
Full details: deepseek by region · sambanova by region.