# deepseek vs openrouter — AI API latency comparison
Updated July 24, 2026. As of July 24, 2026, openrouter has lower edge latency (time-to-first-byte) than deepseek in 4 of 4 measured region(s). From South America (São Paulo), openrouter responds in 56 ms p50 vs 425 ms.

| Region | deepseek p50 | openrouter p50 | Faster |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Asia (Tokyo) | 172 ms | 53 ms | openrouter |
| Europe (Germany) | 299 ms | 99 ms | openrouter |
| South America (São Paulo) | 425 ms | 56 ms | openrouter |
| US (Central) | 309 ms | 58 ms | openrouter |


Source: https://llmlatency.dev/compare/deepseek-vs-openrouter