# cerebras vs typesafe — AI API latency and uptime comparison
Updated September 27, 2026. As of September 27, 2026, cerebras has lower edge latency (time-to-first-byte) than typesafe in 3 of 4 measured region(s). From South America (São Paulo), cerebras responds in 182 ms p50 vs 248 ms.

| Region | cerebras p50 | typesafe p50 | Faster |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Asia (Tokyo) | 200 ms | 148 ms | typesafe |
| Europe (Germany) | 199 ms | 234 ms | cerebras |
| South America (São Paulo) | 182 ms | 248 ms | cerebras |
| US (Central) | 67 ms | 111 ms | cerebras |


## Does cerebras or typesafe have better uptime?

Over the last 24 hours cerebras and typesafe are level on availability at 100% of probes succeeding across 4 region(s). Neither is separated from the other by uptime at this sample size.

| Provider | Probes succeeding | Worst region | there | Samples |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| cerebras | 100% | Asia (Tokyo) | 100% | 1155 |
| typesafe | 100% | Asia (Tokyo) | 100% | 122 |


Observed availability over the last 24 hours, not a contractual SLA. Longer windows: https://llmlatency.dev/best-uptime

Time to first token (TTFT) for both, with the model named: https://llmlatency.dev/time-to-first-token
Source: https://llmlatency.dev/compare/cerebras-vs-typesafe