# anthropic vs sambanova — AI API latency comparison
Updated July 24, 2026. As of July 24, 2026, anthropic has lower edge latency (time-to-first-byte) than sambanova in 3 of 4 measured region(s). From Europe (Germany), anthropic responds in 200 ms p50 vs 397 ms.

| Region | anthropic p50 | sambanova p50 | Faster |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Asia (Tokyo) | 251 ms | 20 ms | sambanova |
| Europe (Germany) | 200 ms | 397 ms | anthropic |
| South America (São Paulo) | 210 ms | 402 ms | anthropic |
| US (Central) | 108 ms | 129 ms | anthropic |


Source: https://llmlatency.dev/compare/anthropic-vs-sambanova