# anthropic vs groq — AI API latency comparison
Updated July 24, 2026. As of July 24, 2026, anthropic has lower edge latency (time-to-first-byte) than groq in 3 of 4 measured region(s). From Europe (Germany), anthropic responds in 200 ms p50 vs 297 ms.

| Region | anthropic p50 | groq p50 | Faster |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Asia (Tokyo) | 251 ms | 147 ms | groq |
| Europe (Germany) | 200 ms | 297 ms | anthropic |
| South America (São Paulo) | 210 ms | 228 ms | anthropic |
| US (Central) | 108 ms | 111 ms | anthropic |


Source: https://llmlatency.dev/compare/anthropic-vs-groq